Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA

Research Recommendations (848)

Export CSV
Graziela Sousa (2021) R627 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Use the proposed actions to support curricular change, including the integration of new curricular units, the attribution of credits for participation in external programs, and the reinforcement of programmatic content.

Audience:
Curriculum leaders, educators, higher-education institutions
Domain:
Curriculum Reform / Fashion Design Education
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Graziela Sousa (2021) R628 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Process & Organization Priority: Medium-High

Create a platform dedicated to Entrepreneurial Fashion Design Education that brings together interested actors, institutional partners, and professionals from the sector.

Audience:
Researchers, educators, industry professionals, institutions
Domain:
Knowledge Platform / Fashion Design Education
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Graziela Sousa (2021) R629 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Establish a national or international body to promote entrepreneurship in Fashion Design and to disseminate and support the initiatives proposed in the thesis.

Audience:
Policy actors, institutions, educators, industry leaders
Domain:
Field Governance / Fashion Entrepreneurship
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Low-Medium
Myrla Torres (2021) R630 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: High

Study and disseminate subjective aspects and immaterial dimensions oriented toward sustainability as a relevant way to raise awareness of the environmental impact generated by solid waste.

Audience:
Researchers, educators, sustainability scholars, designers
Domain:
Sustainability and Design Theory / Immateriality
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Myrla Torres (2021) R631 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Promote the application of the Design, Objects and Memory (DOM) itinerary in product-design project units in order to evaluate paradigm shifts among students.

Audience:
Educators, students, product-design programs
Domain:
Design Education / DOM Itinerary
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
High
Myrla Torres (2021) R632 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Resourcing & Sustainability Priority: High

Continue evaluating individuals’ involvement with everyday objects in order to identify the motives for disposal and to follow the impacts of the energetic paradigm shift in product-design teaching and practice.

Audience:
Researchers, educators, product designers
Domain:
Object Attachment / Disposal / Sustainable Product Design
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Maria Alves (2022) R633 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Methodological Priority: High

Testing with the target audience to measure fluency, comprehension, and completion time.

Audience:
Community/Participants
Domain:
Education
Scope:
Micro
Feasibility:
High
Maria Alves (2022) R634 Policy & Standards Methodological Priority: Medium

Run a pilot in early‑childhood schools focused on symbol literacy.

Audience:
Policymakers
Domain:
Education
Scope:
Micro → Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Maria Alves (2022) R635 Policy & Standards Artifact, System & Service Design Priority: High

Care‑symbol labelling — multi‑brand pilot project.

Audience:
Policymakers
Domain:
Civic
Scope:
Micro → Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Maria Alves (2022) R636 Methodological Priority: Medium

Use comics as a tool for literacy in instructional manuals.

Audience:
Designers
Domain:
HCI
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
High
Maria Alves (2022) R637 Methodological Policy & Standards Priority: High

A simpler system with fewer symbols to improve memorization.

Audience:
Designers
Domain:
HCI
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
High
Maria Alves (2022) R638 Theoretical & Conceptual Resourcing & Sustainability Priority: Medium

Study the relationship between symbol literacy and disposal/environment.

Audience:
Researchers
Domain:
Sustainability
Scope:
Micro
Feasibility:
Medium
Miguel Bual (2022) R639 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Methodological Priority: High

Continue validating the Wi·Air concept through user focus groups, application tests, and scenario-specific experimentation beyond expert review.

Audience:
Researchers, product developers, UX teams
Domain:
Scent Interface Validation / UXD
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
High
Miguel Bual (2022) R640 Artifact, System & Service Design Process & Organization Priority: High

Develop Wi·Air as an open, smart-compatibility system for aroma diffusion that operates within existing Wi-Fi infrastructures rather than requiring a dedicated network protocol.

Audience:
Product developers, IoT designers, industry partners
Domain:
IoT / Smart Aroma Diffusion
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium-High
Miguel Bual (2022) R641 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Process & Organization Priority: Medium-High

Create a structured database to document ideas, applications, experiences, and test results so that knowledge generated through Wi·Air can be reused and developed in the future.

Audience:
Researchers, developers, innovation managers
Domain:
Knowledge Management / Design Innovation
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
High
Miguel Bual (2022) R642 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: Medium-High

Promote continuous and transversal development and testing of applications so that Wi·Air can evolve through collaborative, iterative improvement across multiple teams and contexts.

Audience:
Researchers, industrial partners, multidisciplinary teams
Domain:
Collaborative Innovation / Product-Service Development
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Miguel Bual (2022) R643 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Artifact, System & Service Design Priority: High

Expand research and product development into the broad range of application domains identified for smart aroma interfaces, including health and well-being, medicine, domotics, safety, training, entertainment, marketing, culture, and transport.

Audience:
Researchers, designers, industry partners, public-sector inn...
Domain:
Scent Interfaces / Application Development
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Helena Franco (2022) R644 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Critically analyse the implementation of the proposed action model, concretized as a curricular unit within polytechnic education, and test its replicability in other polytechnic institutions and with other endangered craft techniques.

Audience:
Researchers, educators, curriculum leaders, craft communitie...
Domain:
Design Education / Heritage Safeguarding
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Helena Franco (2022) R645 Process & Organization Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

After the model is implemented and consistent relationships with artisans and the local community are established, evaluate the results obtained in order to define new perspectives that contribute to the promotion, safeguarding, knowledge transmission, and production of Nisa inlaid pottery.

Audience:
Researchers, artisans, local communities, heritage instituti...
Domain:
Heritage Safeguarding / Community Collaboration
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Helena Franco (2022) R646 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Organise a candidature of Nisa inlaid pottery to UNESCO’s List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, building on the evidence and collaborative structures developed through the research.

Audience:
Policy makers, heritage institutions, researchers, municipal...
Domain:
Cultural Policy / Intangible Heritage
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Low-Medium
Rui Grazina (2022) R647 Theoretical & Conceptual Methodological Priority: High

Deepen the investigation of materiality as a complementary counterpart to the current hegemony of visual and digital design tools in project practice.

Audience:
Researchers, design educators, practitioners
Domain:
Design Theory / Materiality
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Rui Grazina (2022) R648 Methodological Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: High

Develop the concept and application of intensive diagrams beyond atmospheric construction, exploring other ways in which the affective body can articulate project processes.

Audience:
Researchers, designers
Domain:
Intensive Diagrams / Design Tools
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Rui Grazina (2022) R649 Theoretical & Conceptual Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Investigate the cognitive mechanisms that may explain how intensive diagrams support designers’ perception of spaces and objects and the transfer of qualities into final design outcomes.

Audience:
Researchers, cognitive design scholars
Domain:
Design Cognition / Perception
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Low-Medium
Rui Grazina (2022) R650 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: Medium-High

Explore additional operational and enriching ways in which the capacities associated with intensive diagrams can be applied within design practice.

Audience:
Designers, educators, researchers
Domain:
Design Practice Innovation
Scope:
Meso → Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Paulo Marcelo (2022) R651 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Use the newly organized archive to identify additional, still-unknown works by Alberto Cardoso and relate them to his confirmed oeuvre.

Audience:
Researchers, archivists, design historians
Domain:
Design History / Archival Research
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium