Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA

Research Recommendations (848)

Export CSV
André Castro (2018) R451 Methodological Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Apply the proposed Form Language Model to other design studios in professional or academic environments in order to test its transferability and comparative value.

Audience:
Researchers, design studios, educators
Domain:
Model Transfer / Comparative Studio Research
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Ana Cristina Dias (2018) R452 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Process & Organization Priority: High

Auscultate the Portuguese manufacturing industry to understand its problems of acceptance and expectations regarding Design activity within companies, updating and deepening the prior questionnaire base.

Audience:
Researchers, manufacturers, policy actors, design educators
Domain:
Knowledge Transfer / Industry Perception of Design
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Ana Cristina Dias (2018) R453 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Review the curricula of master's programs in Product-Service Design (or similar nomenclature) in order to implement or optimize curricular units linked to management and entrepreneurship.

Audience:
Curriculum leaders, educators, universities
Domain:
Curriculum Review / Product-Service Design Education
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Ana Cristina Dias (2018) R454 Artifact, System & Service Design Methodological Priority: High

Complete the development of the TIES Toolkit by producing practical examples for each of its tools, so that the toolkit can be considered fully operational.

Audience:
Researchers, educators, students, interface organizations
Domain:
TIES Toolkit Development
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
High
Ana Cristina Dias (2018) R455 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Process & Organization Priority: Medium-High

Disseminate the TIES model through workshops in higher-education institutions, companies, and design studios, making its functioning and advantages more visible to different stakeholders.

Audience:
Educators, companies, design studios, researchers
Domain:
TIES Model Dissemination
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
High
Ana Cristina Dias (2018) R456 Process & Organization Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Implement and evaluate the two proposed actions—alumni talks and the OI-TIES interface organism—in the short term at FAUL as a practical continuation of the thesis.

Audience:
Researchers, alumni, students, universities
Domain:
Implementation of Alumni Talks and OI-TIES
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Marta Fernandes (2018) R457 Policy & Standards Process & Organization Priority: High

Establish continuous digital-preservation workflows for online content, including cataloguing, migration, and software updating, so that archived information remains accessible rather than merely stored.

Audience:
Archives, Newsrooms, Digital Preservation Teams, Platform Ow...
Domain:
Digital Preservation / Archive Governance
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium-High
Marta Fernandes (2018) R458 Artifact, System & Service Design Methodological Priority: High

Develop digital archives as progressively more visual systems by consolidating and applying a flexible visual lexicon derived from information-visualization structures.

Audience:
Designers, Newsrooms, Archivists, UX Teams
Domain:
Visual Archive Systems / Information Visualization
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium-High
Marta Fernandes (2018) R459 Process & Organization Artifact, System & Service Design Priority: Medium-High

Maintain stable navigation and interface conventions in visual archives so users can build familiarity over time and face a lower learning curve when exploring archived content.

Audience:
UX Teams, Newsrooms, Archive Product Managers
Domain:
Interface Stability / Archive Navigation
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
High
Marta Fernandes (2018) R460 Artifact, System & Service Design Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Extend the P3 laboratory archive project into a longer-duration, fully functional model, so that the proposed visual archive can be tested beyond exploratory prototype conditions.

Audience:
Researchers, Newsroom Product Teams, Developers
Domain:
Prototype Development / News Archive
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
Medium
Marta Fernandes (2018) R461 Artifact, System & Service Design Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: Medium

Create cross-linked visual archives for design history - connecting authors, themes, dates, and places - so that relationships in design’s intangible heritage become visible and searchable.

Audience:
Design Historians, Curators, Educators, Digital Archivists
Domain:
Design History / Linked Archives
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Marta Fernandes (2018) R462 Methodological Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: Medium

Advance research at the intersection of big data, thick data, and multifaceted dashboard-like interfaces to support richer visual archives and evolving forms of interpretation.

Audience:
Researchers, Data Designers, Digital Humanities Teams
Domain:
Data-rich Interface Research
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Joana Francisco (2018) R463 Methodological Artifact, System & Service Design Priority: High

Use Tool i as a systematic project-support instrument so that inclusiveness and identity are integrated from the earliest stages of urban resting-equipment design.

Audience:
Urban Designers, Product Designers, Municipal Teams
Domain:
Inclusive Urban Equipment / Design Method
Scope:
Meso → Macro
Feasibility:
High
Joana Francisco (2018) R464 Artifact, System & Service Design Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Translate the tool results into project guidance that favors neutral colours, textured and local materials, wooden modular solutions with backrests, rounded edges, and bench types suited to longer stays.

Audience:
Urban Equipment Designers, Municipal Procurement Teams, Manu...
Domain:
Urban Resting Equipment / Design Guidelines
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
High
Joana Francisco (2018) R465 Artifact, System & Service Design Methodological Priority: Medium-High

Adapt Tool i to a digital and mobile format so that the evaluation process becomes easier to deploy, document, and reuse in design practice.

Audience:
Designers, Municipal Teams, Researchers
Domain:
Digital Tooling / Urban Design Support
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
Medium-High
Joana Francisco (2018) R466 Methodological Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: Medium

Improve the digital version of Tool i with a standardized evaluation grid, image upload, individual object sheets, and fields for recording the object’s exact implantation location.

Audience:
App Developers, Researchers, Municipal Asset Managers
Domain:
Data Capture / Evaluation Workflow
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
High
Joana Francisco (2018) R467 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: Medium-High

Disseminate Tool i and monitor its acceptance and impact among designers, municipalities, and companies, while using it to support the development of new urban-equipment concepts.

Audience:
Municipalities, Firms, Design Studios, Researchers
Domain:
Tool Dissemination / Practice Uptake
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
High
Joana Francisco (2018) R468 Participation, Equity & Ethics Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: Medium

Convene municipalities, professional studios, design schools, and user groups to test the digital version of Tool i, and release the application in Portuguese and English to broaden access.

Audience:
Municipalities, Design Schools, User Groups, International P...
Domain:
Participatory Testing / Internationalization
Scope:
Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Sara Garcia (2018) R469 Methodological Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: Medium-High

Extend the multipurpose-chair sample into an accessible, editable database that incorporates new chair classes and additional chairs, so the descriptive base evolves together with the ontology and supports broader retrieval and comparison.

Audience:
Researchers, Design Historians, Tool Developers
Domain:
Design Data / Chair Typologies
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
High
Sara Garcia (2018) R470 Methodological Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: High

Formalize, extend, and implement the ontology so that functions, materials, part connections, higher shape detail, and additional generation processes are systematically represented and shareable.

Audience:
Researchers, Knowledge Engineers, Computational Designers
Domain:
Ontology Engineering / Product Representation
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
Medium-High
Sara Garcia (2018) R471 Artifact, System & Service Design Methodological Priority: High

Extend the Multipurpose Chair Grammar with rules and parameters for greater shape detail, explicit part connections, solid-part positioning, material descriptions, and languages that go beyond multipurpose chairs.

Audience:
Computational Designers, Researchers, Furniture-System Devel...
Domain:
Grammar-Based Generative Design
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
Medium
Sara Garcia (2018) R472 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Methodological Priority: Medium-High

Undertake broader analytic and synthetic tests on the MCG and Meta-Grammar by incorporating other existing specific grammars, generating new specific grammars, and applying the meta-grammar to other product classes.

Audience:
Researchers, Computational Design Evaluators
Domain:
System Evaluation / Grammar Testing
Scope:
Meso → Macro
Feasibility:
Medium
Sara Garcia (2018) R473 Artifact, System & Service Design Methodological Priority: High

Expand ChairDNA so it can generate additional multipurpose-chair variants (such as asymmetric chairs), other chair and seat types (such as longue chairs and benches), other furniture types (such as dining tables), and reusable templates for materials and design types.

Audience:
Software Developers, Designers, Researchers
Domain:
Digital Design Tooling
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
Medium-High
Sara Garcia (2018) R474 Artifact, System & Service Design Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Refine ChairDNA with higher shape detail and automatic modes: constrain random generation, automate collections/styles/hybrid generation, and add optimization routines that select solutions against goals such as lower material use, higher resistance, or lower cost.

Audience:
Tool Developers, Designers, Optimization Researchers
Domain:
Computational Design Optimization
Scope:
Meso
Feasibility:
Medium
Maria Lourenço (2018) R475 Process & Organization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Apply the Design for Social Inclusion model in other socially excluded neighborhoods and multicultural urban contexts, adapting it to local residents, associations, and resources.

Audience:
Designers, Municipalities, NGOs, Community Associations
Domain:
Social Design / Community Inclusion
Scope:
Meso → Macro
Feasibility:
Medium-High