Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2025_lameiro

Design de Comunicação para Teatro

O processo de construção da identidade visual do espetáculo contemporâneo.

Name
Mónica Lameiro
Year
2025
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Teresa Cabral, Rafael Pozo-Puértolas
Discipline
Communication Design
Scope
Identity Design
Taxonomy
Praxiology
Type
Theoretical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
144,789 / 381
Joint supervision
No

The role and methodology of communication design in constructing visual identity systems for contemporary theatre productions

Research Process (5 methods)

  • 1. Literature review N = unspecified
    Exploratory Qualitative

    x

  • 2. Interview N = 6
    Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

    Professionals related to theater, including stage directors, artistic directors, and communication directors

  • 3. Interview N = 8
    Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

    National and international communication designers with extensive experience in the field of theater

  • 4. Workshop N = 120
    Generative/Evaluative Qualitative

    Final-year undergraduate students of Design and Graphic Production

  • 5. Expert panel N = 8
    Evaluative Qualitative

    Theater specialists and communication designers (some with academic roles)

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process) Exchange with Academia

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context No No No
Vision No Yes Yes
Means No No No

Recommendations (19)

R827 Process & Organization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Communicate a clear overall artistic vision and specific design intentions to the designer so that the visual identity of the performance aligns with the director’s concept.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R828 Process & Organization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Maintain open and continuous communication with the designer throughout the production process, allowing questions, feedback, and shared discussion of ideas.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R829 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Share expectations regarding the image of the play, its dissemination, deadlines, budget, and formal production requirements so the designer can work within clear parameters.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R830 Participation, Equity & Ethics Process & Organization Priority: High

Allow the designer enough creative freedom, space, and time to explore multiple visual approaches rather than forcing an early closure of the proposal.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium
R831 Process & Organization Artifact, System & Service Design Priority: High

Provide the designer with adequate resources, including access to texts, rehearsals, photographs, backstage visits, and detailed production information.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R832 Process & Organization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Maintain creative collaboration with the designer through meetings, brainstorming, and constructive dialogue, offering feedback while remaining open to adjustments.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R833 Participation, Equity & Ethics Process & Organization Priority: Medium-High

Recognize and respect the designer’s expertise, trusting their ability to translate the artistic vision into an effective communication project.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium
R834 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: Medium-High

Keep the communication team open to change by allowing design revisions and schedule adjustments as the production evolves and new needs emerge.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium
R835 Process & Organization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Communicate clearly with the artistic director from the beginning of the process and openly acknowledge blocks or dead ends when the current visual strategy is not working.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R836 Participation, Equity & Ethics Process & Organization Priority: High

Be prepared to receive constructive feedback and adjust the work until the image fully satisfies the artistic vision and communication needs of the production.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R837 Process & Organization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Collaborate actively in all production meetings, contributing ideas and suggestions that support the overall success of the performance.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium-High
R838 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: Medium-High

Remain flexible in dealing with last-minute changes, special communication needs, and adjustments throughout rehearsals and the run of the show.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium
R839 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: Medium

Keep updated on current theatre-design trends, communication practices, technologies, and visual styles at both national and international levels.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R840 Participation, Equity & Ethics Process & Organization Priority: Medium-High

Respect the artistic director’s vision throughout all phases of the design process, recognizing that design proposals will always be judged in relation to that vision.

Scope
Meso
Time Horizon
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
High
R841 Theoretical & Conceptual Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Extend the study to smaller-scale theatrical contexts and local communities, where the relationships between design, institutions, and audiences may take different forms.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
Medium
R842 Methodological Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Carry out more interviews and deepen the study in segmented ways, focusing separately on theatre scale, designer typology, or collaboration typology.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
Medium
R843 Theoretical & Conceptual Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: Medium-High

Develop an Iberian comparative study between the Portuguese and Spanish cultural markets, especially cities such as Lisbon and Madrid or Porto and Barcelona, in order to identify processual and aesthetic convergences and divergences.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
Medium
R844 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Map existing theatre educational programs and design workshops, then develop seminars, debates, and practical activities that teach design-for-theatre principles, visual representation techniques, and the use of tools and software.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Medium → Long
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium
R845 Theoretical & Conceptual Artifact, System & Service Design Priority: High

Study the impact and practices of artificial intelligence in the visual construction of the play’s identity and in the unfolding of communication materials.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
Medium