Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2022_oliveira

Design Decolonial

Contribuições ao Pensamento Crítico e Projetual no Ensino de Design no Brasil

Name
Lorena Oliveira
Year
2022
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Marcos Braga, Rita Almendra
Discipline
Design
Scope
Design Education
Taxonomy
Epistemology
Type
Theoretical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
105,601 / 299
Joint supervision
Yes (Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo)

Decolonial design education and critical pedagogy in Brazilian design schools

Research Process (11 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. Interview N = 4
Exploratory Qualitative

Influential community leaders (a priest and a pedagogical coordinator) and local artists

3. Workshop N = 30
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Participatory

Students from the UFRN Cultural Anthropology class and various community members (children, adults, and the elderly)

4. Critical incident technique N = unspecified
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Participatory

Students from the "Oficina de Modelos e Materiais II" course

5. Workshop N = 11
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Participatory

Using photography to document residents' perceptions of positive and negative points within their neighborhood

6. Workshop N = unspecified
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Participatory

Community members, local artists, and design students

7. Critical incident technique N = 24
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Participatory

Students from the "Design de Serviços" course

8. Workshop N = 24
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Participatory

Groups of design students and community residents

9. Interview N = 37
Generative/Evaluative Qualitative

UFRN students who participated in the Cultural Anthropology and Service Design classes

10. Experiment N = 36
Generative Qualitative

Design students from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)

11. Oral history N = 6
Generative Qualitative

Design professors from various public Brazilian universities (USP, UEMG, UFMA, UFPE, and UERJ-ESDI)

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Exchange with Academia

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context No No No
Vision Yes No No
Means No No No

Recommendations (6)

R662 Theoretical & Conceptual Process & Organization Priority: High

Ensure the presence of transgressive educators who can challenge dominant epistemologies and pedagogical routines in design education.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R663 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Embed pedagogical actions directly within design project practice instead of separating critical reflection from project-based learning.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R664 Participation, Equity & Ethics Methodological Priority: High

Start from projects that are explicitly linked to local context, community realities, and lived conditions rather than abstract or imported problem framings.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium-High
R665 Theoretical & Conceptual Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Seek other epistemological directions in design teaching by incorporating non-hegemonic references, Latin American thought, and plural ways of knowing and making.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R666 Theoretical & Conceptual Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: Medium-High

Teach design through historical understanding that values collective memories and resistance movements as sources of design knowledge and critical positioning.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R667 Theoretical & Conceptual Process & Organization Priority: Medium-High

Affirm Brazilian decolonial design education as a political utopia that orients teaching toward transformation rather than mere professional adaptation.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Low-Medium