Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2020_veiga

Indiscipline

Social design principles and practices: how designers work in this realm

Name
Inês Veiga
Year
2020
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Rita Almendra, Thomas Binder
Discipline
Design
Scope
Social Design
Taxonomy
Epistemology/Praxiology
Type
Theoretical
Language
English
Wordcount / Pagecount
126,423 / 327
Joint supervision
No

Social and activist critical practices in Co-design.

Research Process (5 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. CoDesign N = unspecified
Exploratory/Generative/Evaluative Qualitative Participatory

The ERC Project in Bairro da Cova da Moura: experimental project using bottom-up processes of spatial intervention departing from the struggles to reclaim the Right to the City experienced by the people of the Cova da Moura neighbourhood.

3. CoDesign N = unspecified
Exploratory/Generative/Evaluative Qualitative Participatory

The ERC Project, follow up project.

4. CoDesign N = unspecified
Exploratory/Generative/Evaluative Qualitative Participatory

A BIP/ZIP initiative with local partners to adress ethnic conflicts and spatial issues in the neighbourhood near the Lisbon School of Architecture.

5. CoDesign N = unspecified
Exploratory/Generative/Evaluative Qualitative Participatory

Collaboration in the Vitoria Gardens Collection by Sofia Borges; including designers, the artist, the Portela Ward, the Hindu community, the ward gardeners, the dwellers of Quinta da Vitória.

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Exchange with community

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context No No No
Vision No No No
Means No Yes No

Recommendations (5)

R601 Methodological Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: High

Take the research as a starting point to continue performatively deconstructing and recomposing visual communication design so that its possibilities for different kinds of social design practices become visible.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R602 Theoretical & Conceptual Methodological Priority: High

Take indiscipline further as both a hypothesis and a method in studies with and about diffuse designers, and in research that combines theories from within and beyond design.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R603 Theoretical & Conceptual Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Explore in depth the diffuse side of design as a way for design experts to better understand the politics of designing things with others.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R604 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: Medium-High

Expand the inventive and pedagogic potentials of indiscipline as a concept for understanding the social turn and for practicing socially engaged design in ways that are better for others and for designers themselves.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium-High
R605 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: Medium-High

Articulate indiscipline in design education by investigating how and when students may be ready for design practice to become a more living thing.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium