Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2020_plentz

Sustentabilidade no Ensino do Design

Diretrizes e Estratégias para o Brasil e Portugal

Name
Natália Plentz
Year
2020
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Rita Almendra
Discipline
Design
Scope
Design Education
Taxonomy
Epistemology/Praxiology
Type
Theoretical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
117,552 / 330
Joint supervision
No

Teaching Design for Sustainability in higher education in Portugal and Brazil

Research Process (14 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. Document analysis N = Unspecified
Exploratory Qualitative

higher education Design courses in Brazil and Portugal

3. Interview N = 4
Exploratory Qualitative
4. Interview N = 7
Exploratory Qualitative

7 students (one from each of 7 groups in a Service Design course) and conversations with student pairs (in a Product and Service Sustainability master's course)

5. Interview N = 20
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

Course coordinators and professors involved with sustainability

6. Questionnaire N = 73
Exploratory/Generative Both

48 Students and 25 ex- students

7. Questionnaire N = 25
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

Former students suggested by professors and coordinators

8. Mapping N = 350
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

Design education Curricula from 4 universities

9. Mapping N = 33
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

8 Theses and 25 Dissertations focused on Sustainability

10. Case study N = x
Generative Qualitative
11. Focus group N = 7
Generative Qualitative

A mix of professors, students, and Design professionals

12. Tool development
Generative Qualitative Design process

Textbook development

13. Expert panel N = 8
Evaluative Both

Experts (professors with experience in Design and sustainability) from Brazil and Portugal

14. Workshop N = 15
Evaluative Qualitative

2-day workshop with students

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Exchange with Academia

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context No No No
Vision Yes No No
Means Yes No No

Recommendations (11)

R580 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Work on sustainability from the beginning of the degree to reduce student'sdifficultyin dealing with the compelxity of inserting it.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R581 Process & Organization Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: High

Avoid separating projects into “sustainable” and “non‑sustainable”, treating sustainability as a transversal premise.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R582 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: Medium-High

Have specific sustainability courses to reduce fragmented knowledge.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R583 Methodological Process & Organization Priority: High

Working on sustainability through project‑based approaches to reduce the difficulty of applying concepts in practice.

Scope:
Micro → Meso
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R584 Process & Organization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Including sustainability in course syllabi to avoid dependence on the teacher’s individual will or vision.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R585 Artifact, System & Service Design Methodological Priority: Medium

Proposing classroom practices to address sustainability, supporting teachers in identifying the most effective teaching approaches.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R586 Artifact, System & Service Design Process & Organization Priority: High

Develop a dedicated course model with defined objectives, contents, and competencies to minimise fragmented knowledge and existing gaps.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R587 Participation, Equity & Ethics Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: Medium-High

Conducting sustainability workshops and meetings to ensure instructors remain updated and to align divergent pedagogical perspectives.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R588 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Methodological Priority: Medium

Develop a questionnaire to diagnose how sustainability is being integrated into higher education.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R589 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Process & Organization Priority: High

Implement the proposed model and assess impacts using the questionnaire before and after.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R590 Theoretical & Conceptual Methodological Priority: Medium

Conduct studies in additional countries to verify whether the model can be applied in other contexts.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium