Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2019_porto

Processos de design e inovação social

Expectativas, êxitos, e desvios em projetos financiados

Name
Renata Porto
Year
2019
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Ana Vasconcelos, Rita Almendra
Discipline
Design
Scope
Social Design
Taxonomy
Praxiology
Type
Theoretical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
81,200 / 232
Joint supervision
No

Design processes in social innovation initiatives

Research Process (6 methods)

  • 1. Literature review N = x
    Exploratory

    x

  • 2. Questionnaire N = 19
    Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

    Researchers and professors from Latin America higher education institutions

  • 3. Desk research N = 9
    Generative Qualitative

    Social innovation design cases

  • 4. Case study N = 6
    Generative Qualitative

    Social innovation design cases

  • 5. Interview N = unspecified
    Generative Qualitative

    Designers, professors, design researchers involved in real-world cases

  • 6. Document analysis N = 6
    Generative Qualitative

    Social innovation design cases

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process) Produced with input

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context Yes No No
Vision No No No
Means No No No

Recommendations (7)

R543 Theoretical & Conceptual Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Expand the theoretical foundation of Design and Social Innovation studies by broadening the bibliographic references used, given the extensive literature evidenced by the thesis.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
High
R544 Theoretical & Conceptual Process & Organization Priority: High

Incorporate the social structures that contextualize projects, rather than focusing only on the designer as an agent of Social Innovation.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
Medium
R545 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Methodological Priority: High

Create appropriate tools to evaluate the results of Design in Social Innovation and measure the impact of actions qualitatively and quantitatively using defined criteria.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium
R546 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Resourcing & Sustainability Priority: High

Carry out comparative studies between Design and Social Innovation processes supported by public-origin policy tools and those supported by private-origin policy tools.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
Medium
R547 Methodological Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Create analytical criteria to investigate Design deliverables in depth and test whether those responses can be compared using innovation scales.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
Medium
R548 Theoretical & Conceptual Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Conduct isolated studies on each project typology in Design and Social Innovation: research-oriented projects, teaching-oriented projects, and professional-practice projects.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Long
Evidence Strength
Exploratory
Feasibility
High
R549 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Include leaders, administrators, and staff involved in managing the policy tools within the interview sample, and collect these interviews early in the data-gathering process in order to diagnose their perceptions of Design processes and results.

Scope
Macro
Time Horizon
Medium → Long
Evidence Strength
Indicative
Feasibility
Medium