Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2019_dias

Popping Up

Desenhando um modelo concetual para o processo em design ou a efemeridade em busca do seu desígnio

Name
José Silveira Dias
Year
2019
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Maria Loução, Maria João Neto
Discipline
Ambient Design
Scope
Ephemeral Architecture
Taxonomy
Praxiology
Type
Theoretical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
201,950 / 577
Joint supervision
No

Conceptual model for the Pop Up space typology

Research Process (10 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. Document analysis N = 4
Exploratory Qualitative

Reference examples of real-world pop up projects

3. Document analysis N = 7
Exploratory Qualitative

Project examples in commercial settings

4. Document analysis N = 2
Exploratory Qualitative

Project examples in higher-education context

5. Design project N = 20
Generative Qualitative Design process

Pop-up project for brand Camper with architecture master students

6. Design project N = 53
Generative Qualitative Design process

Pop-up social project for brand Camper with undergraduate design students

7. Design project N = 36
Generative Qualitative Design process

Pop-up project for urban space in Lisbon with undergraduate design students

8. Design project N = 44
Generative Qualitative Design process

Pop-up project for urban space in Lisbon in cooperation with Piaggio brand with interior architecture master design students

9. Tool development N = 1
Generative Qualitative

Popping up conceptual tool for pop up projects

10. Questionnaire N = 15
Evaluative Qualitative

Group of experts

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Exchange with Academia

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context No No No
Vision Yes No No
Means No No No

Recommendations (6)

R521 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Process & Organization Priority: High

Demonstrate the conceptual model through practice in multiple domains—social, consumption, education, and health—to verify its adequacy wherever participatory collaboration is central.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory → Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R522 Artifact, System & Service Design Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Apply and validate the model in real professional contexts—not only academic tests—especially in retail-like and social settings, including projects aimed at improving the quality of everyday urban life.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R523 Methodological Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Simplify the visual schema of the model and develop a procedural guide so that its concepts, relations, and movements become easier to understand, teach, and apply.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R524 Artifact, System & Service Design Process & Organization Priority: Medium-High

Develop domain-specific application typologies and practical demonstrations of the conceptual model through trials in professional (non-academic) project contexts.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R525 Participation, Equity & Ethics Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Test the model against the sociotechnical systems of concrete problem-situations, including stakeholder needs and expectations, human physical and cognitive capacities, and the relation between behavior and technology.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium → Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory → Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R526 Theoretical & Conceptual Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: Medium

Investigate, from an anthropological perspective, the comparative relation between models of social ritualization and non-linear cultural models of time.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Low-Medium