Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2017_guerreiro

O impacto da reforma universitária no ensino do design em Portugal nos graus de licenciado e mestre

Name
Maria Guerreiro
Year
2017
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Maria Mendes, Fernando Moreira da Silva
Discipline
Design
Scope
Design Education
Taxonomy
Epistemology
Type
Theoretical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
140,700 / 402
Joint supervision
No

University education of design in Portugal

Research Process (5 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. Document analysis N = unspecified
Generative Quantitative

Education statistics related to HEIs with courses in the area of design

3. Questionnaire N = 435
Generative Qualitative

Master and undergraduate design students

4. Observation N = unspecified
Exploratory Qualitative Observational

In-class design students

5. Interview N = 19
Generative Qualitative

Professors and course coordinators

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Produced with input

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context Yes No No
Vision No No No
Means No No No

Recommendations (7)

R393 Policy & Standards Process & Organization Priority: High

Harmonize public higher-education Design curricula with Bologna directives, reducing the curricular incongruities identified between institutions and between the first and second cycles.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R394 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Deepen competency-based teaching in Design through stronger use of project work, experimental practice, and transversal-skills development, replacing overly passive content-delivery models.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R395 Process & Organization Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: High

Train Design students to “learn to learn,” adapt quickly to technological, scientific, and professional change, and understand the broader social function of design—not only its immediate technical outputs.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium-High
R396 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Expand structured collaboration with communities, companies, and research-and-development partners through live projects, visits, seminars, and formal protocols that connect theory, practice, and experience.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R397 Process & Organization Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Strengthen transition-to-work mechanisms in Design education, including closer employer contact, clearer insertion-into-active-life supports, and systematic tracking of graduate outcomes.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium-High
R398 Methodological Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

In future studies, include alumni and professional workplaces in data collection so that analysis extends beyond current students and captures the post-graduation effects of higher-education policy on Design practice.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R399 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: Medium-High

Identify, compare, and disseminate the strongest pedagogical and curricular practices across public Design schools, using them as shared references for improving teaching quality and institutional learning.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High