Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2016_lopes

Design(ing) para a inclusão em escolas básicas do 1º ciclo

Name
Lígia Lopes
Year
2016
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
Fernando Moreira da Silva
Discipline
Product Design
Scope
Inclusive Design
Taxonomy
Epistemology/Praxiology
Type
Theoretical/Practical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
117,950 / 337
Joint supervision
No

The role of design for inclusion in primary schools

Research Process (13 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. Questionnaire N = 40
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

First-cycle education teachers

3. Questionnaire N = 25
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative

Parents of children with special needs in the first-cycle of education

4. Workshop N = 5
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Observational

24 hours inclusive design project with multidisciplinary teams

5. Workshop N = 4
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Observational

24 hours inclusive design project with multidisciplinary teams

6. Workshop N = 5
Exploratory/Generative Qualitative Observational

24 hours inclusive design project with multidisciplinary teams

7. Design project N = Unspecified
Generative Qualitative Design process

CoDesign project with special needs children

8. Design project N = 1
Generative Qualitative Design process

CoDesign project with teenager with Asperger syndrome

9. Design project N = 20
Generative Qualitative Design process

CoDesign project with special needs children

10. Tool development N = 1
Generative Qualitative Design process

Tool development for participatory practices in first-cycle schools

11. Usability test N = 13
Evaluative Qualitative Participatory

Usability test in first cycle school

12. Usability test N = Unspecified
Evaluative Qualitative Participatory

Usability test in first cycle school

13. Questionnaire N = 9
Evaluative Qualitative

Group of experts

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Exchange with community

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context No No No
Vision No Yes No
Means No No No

Recommendations (7)

R352 Participation, Equity & Ethics Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Test the addition of intergenerational relationships within the participatory design context in order to verify the effective benefits of those interactions.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R353 Methodological Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Apply and reinterpret the proposed methodology in other participatory-design works so that its actions can be tested beyond the thesis' original topic.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R354 Process & Organization Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Priority: High

Use the document as a basis for other researchers to justify the benefits of triangulation between the scientific community, final users, and public/community bodies.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R355 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Promote the growth of participatory and inclusive practices in design research, ensuring that designers respect users' needs, aspirations, and desires, and use design as an instrument to provoke and mobilize society.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R356 Artifact, System & Service Design Resourcing & Sustainability Priority: High

Continue the work in the partner schools by executing the agglomerated-cork pieces, evaluating them in context of use, and testing a new version using carpentry waste from Nautilus.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R357 Process & Organization Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Apply the intervention model at municipal scale, including pilot schemes such as 'A TUA ESCOLA ÉS TU', to test its broader governance and implementation potential.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R358 Dissemination & Knowledge Mobilization Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Experiment with the methodology in disadvantaged or at-risk contexts outside Portugal, such as the Inclusive Beirut line of work, in order to test its transferability across socially conflicted environments.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium