Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2015_barros

Mass customization in the furniture design history

The case of Thonet Chairs

Name
Mário Barros
Year
2015
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
José Pinto Duarte, Bruno Chaparro
Discipline
Product Design
Scope
Parametric Design
Taxonomy
Praxiology/Phenomenology
Type
Theoretical/Practical
Language
English
Wordcount / Pagecount
101,150 / 289
Joint supervision
No

Developing a design model for mass customization in the furniture industry

Research Process (4 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. Document analysis N = 1
Exploratory Qualitative

Thonet chair case study

3. Tool development N = 1
Generative Qualitative Design process

Generative Design System to generate Thonet chair variations

4. Virtual Prototyping N = 1
Evaluative Both

Tool testing

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Produced without exchange

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context No No No
Vision Yes Partially No
Means No No No

Recommendations (8)

R258 Artifact, System & Service Design Resourcing & Sustainability Priority: High

Further develop and test the reconfigurable production system for wood bending until full implementation is achieved, aiming at automated manufacturing of custom bentwood components.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R259 Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Methodological Priority: High

Assess the shape-evaluation subsystem by comparing simulation results with experimental physical tests on constructed custom chairs, in order to fine-tune the simulation and optimisation properties.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R260 Artifact, System & Service Design Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Develop frontend applications for end users—such as configurators or innovation toolkits—that support different levels of control, interactivity, and openness during customisation procedures.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium → Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R261 Theoretical & Conceptual Methodological Priority: High

Use the grammar-based approach to develop new product types and new sets of functions, including the exploration of generic and specific grammars and the encoding of intrinsic and extrinsic product functions.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R262 Process & Organization Methodological Priority: High

Implement information to support all phases of the design process—conceptual, embodiment, detail design, production, manufacturing, and assembly—and formalise it as reusable libraries for future product development.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R263 Artifact, System & Service Design Methodological Priority: High

Develop custom-built integrative software capable of seamless integration and reuse of information produced by the different parts of the generative design system.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R264 Methodological Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: High

Define multi-objective optimisation problems that combine different design goals—rather than only structural integrity—using weighted objective functions.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R265 Process & Organization Resourcing & Sustainability Priority: High

Study sustainable reconfigurable tooling systems capable of producing customised designs, with the broader aim of encouraging mass customisation as a new production standard.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium