Skip to main content
REDES – Research & Education in Design TENDA
← Back to the list
dt_faul_2012_silva_l

A (in)visibilidade dos objectos

Design, Arte, apropriação, autoria e circulação na era da informação

Name
Luís Silva
Year
2012
Institution
Lisbon School of Architecture Universidade de Lisboa
Supervisors
José Miranda, Maria João Durão
Discipline
Design
Scope
Authorship
Taxonomy
Ontology
Type
Theoretical
Language
Portuguese
Wordcount / Pagecount
136,395 / 433
Joint supervision
No

Exploring the problem of authorship in design and art

Research Process (3 methods)

1. Literature review N = x
Exploratory Qualitative

x

2. Case study N = 1
Generative Qualitative

Artistic example

3. Case study N = 1
Generative Qualitative

Case study of the legal battle between photographer Art Rogers and artist Jeff Koons

Knowledge Transfer & Exchange

Knowledge Exchange (PhD Process): Produced without exchange

IK&T Academia Design Practice Society
Context Yes No No
Vision No No No
Means No No No

Recommendations (6)

R138 Process & Organization Theoretical & Conceptual Priority: High

Make copyright, appropriation, and property regimes a core part of design education and professional training so designers can act critically and lucidly in digital culture.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
High
R139 Policy & Standards Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: High

Revisit copyright and intellectual-property frameworks for digital design practice and test more flexible licensing models that protect authorship while enabling legitimate reuse, quotation, and circulation.

Scope:
Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium → Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R140 Theoretical & Conceptual Process & Organization Priority: High

Treat economic, political, and legal forces as intrinsic dimensions of design practice rather than external constraints, and embed them directly into design methods and critique.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium-High
R141 Methodological Participation, Equity & Ethics Priority: Medium-High

Recognize appropriation, remix, and critical reuse as legitimate design/art strategies, but pair them with explicit ethical, contextual, and legal evaluation protocols.

Scope:
Meso
Time Horizon:
Short → Medium
Evidence Strength:
Indicative
Feasibility:
Medium
R142 Artifact, System & Service Design Evaluation, Monitoring & Impact Priority: Medium

Develop and test critical design interventions that expose how brands, luxury, and price construct the symbolic value of objects, using market-facing experiments similar to ERASED PRICE.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
Medium
R143 Theoretical & Conceptual Methodological Priority: High

Investigate how digital reproduction dissolves distinctions between original/copy, producer/consumer, and object/image, and update design theory and pedagogy accordingly.

Scope:
Meso → Macro
Time Horizon:
Medium → Long
Evidence Strength:
Exploratory
Feasibility:
High